Yes, I'd recently read somewhere that Foliar Spraying is MUCH more efficient at getting nutrients
into a tree's system than laying the same fertilizer on the ground. A bit more work, perhaps, but then again, if you've got the 2 gal sprayer already filled with liquid worm poop, then one can cover a lot of trees, I would think. I just like the idea of soil that is alive and feeding the roots.
So, was it Zands and Fruitlovers who both feel that Worm Castings are not enough to only use as the NPK ingredients, especially the nitrogen? Well that's interesting because wasn't it Dr. Campbell who said he ONLY uses Potassium to feed established plants.
Anyone know the NPK component of worm castings....well....let me look it up right now....
OH, and a very interesting article came with that info:
Worm castings are basically the same as 'normal' compost. However, it is thought that worm castings have several benefits over plain ole' compost.
The nutrients in worm castings have exceptionally high availability for the plants, so that while the numbers on analysis sheets may appear low, worm castings make for nutrient rich diet for plants.
Worm castings provide a very good structure to the soil, thanks to the mucus coating that the worms provide and because of high humus content. Thus mucus coating also keeps the nutrients available, providing natures own slow-release nutrients. Worm castings also retains water very well.
Worm castings are thought to contain a chitinaze-enzyme, a enzyme that melts the chitin that most insects exo-skeleton is made of. This means worm castings acts as a pest repellent/pesticide, and possibly can even trigger chitinaze production in plants, too.
Worm castings also have strong and live beneficial bacterial populations. These bacterial populations will act as a line of defense against pathogenic bacteria and fungi.
Worm castings' nutrient content depends on the diet the worms have been fed with.
To answer with a quote:
"Analysis of earthworm casting reveals that they are richer in plant nutrients than the soil, about three times more calcium and several times more nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium." (K.P. Barley, Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 13, 1961, p. 251)
Usually plain worm castings made from variety of organic waste will support plant growth without additional nutrients for some weeks (3 to 5 weeks), although my experience is nitrogen and magnesium supplement doesnt hurt (with a N & Mg greedy plant).
The worms will consume nutrients from the waste, naturally, into their bodies. This is not lost however, as the worms themselves make an excellent fertilizer (NPK 10-1-1 with high calcium and magnesium).
Worm casting NPK numbers found on the internet range from NPK 3-2-2 to 0.5-0.1-0.1. Worm castings also usually contains high levels of other macronutrients and micronutrients, and while the three main nutrient levels may appear low, there is usually plenty of micronutrients in worm castings, and the general nutrient availability is high.
But again, this depends on what feed the worm castings was made with.
Here are two analyses of different vermicomposts:
Parameters: Eisenia foetida - Perionyx excavatus - FYM
pH: 7.40 - 7.00 - 7.200
Organic Carbon (%): 27.43 - 30.31 - 12.20
Total nitrogen (%): 0.60 - 0.66 - 0.55
Total phosphate (%): 1.34 - 1.93 - 0.75
Total potassium (%): 0.40 - 0.42 - 2.30
C: N ratio: 45.70 - 45.90 - 24.4Here's the page it came from, which contains more How-To info as well:
http://www.420magazine.com/forums/how-grow-marijuana/71705-worm-farming-basics.htmlMangoEyeTooth