What do you know about this as a fertilizer/soil amendment? We have a huge rice industry here as well as a brick industry. The brickyards mostly all use rice husks for fuel. Some places give away the resultant ash.
Some concerns I have are that the rice production is subjected to lots of chemicals: pesticides, fungicides. I would assume all of this would be volatilized when burned, but maybe not? I also can't really find any proper analysis that would mention the percentage of N P K Ca Mg S and its CaCO3 equivalence. Softwood ash has about a 30% lime equivalence, but a short-term residual liming effect, so it doesn't seem like it would be very effective to decrease subsoil Aluminum saturation. I can't imagine that rice husk ash would have a significantly longer term effect than wood ash.
Here's one source:
The rice husk ash (RHA) was produced from rice husks pellets (6 mm in diameter) burned in a boiler with a rotary grate, specially designed for producing biofuels. The burning temperature inside the combustion chamber was kept below the melting temperature of the ash and reached 980 to 1030 °C. The combustion temperature at the outlet of the chamber ranged from 750 to 920 °C. The time of complete combustion of the rice husks was in the range of 4 to 6 min. The pH of the used RHA was 10.7 and the material contained 0.27% of N, 4.02% of C, 1.45% of P, 0.6% of Mg, 3.88% of K, 0.51% of Ca, 0.05% of S and 0.08% of Na.
No idea the temperatures used here and all those other parameters, but those nutrients percentages are very low. By comparison, the Umass.edu table
shows wood ash (guessing its hardwood)
Wood ashes - N0 P2 K6 Ca20 Mg1
Maybe if I can talk to the airforce to do a flyover and get them to drop a few tanker loads worth of the stuff, I think it could be promising.