Jeff, I can't say for sure, but I do believe that may be the case. Why would you perform regular applications of something else, when once a year application of this is highly effective? Maybe I'm rationalizing here, but the fact that it is a neonicotinoid makes me feel a bit better, I do believe that is a fairly safe substance. Here, to avoid going cross-eyed reading the entire article, here is the bottom line, cut and pasted.
NOTE: NOEL means No Observable Effects Limits, which in this case is 20 ppb.
Putting The Data Into Context
Imidacloprid is critical to the management of the Asian citrus psyllid
in California citrus, and its use will likely increase as the number
of insect detections on commercial citrus increases. The correct
timing of treatments will be essential to provide protection to
the youngest flush on the trees, which are important for psyllid
feeding and development. But the timing of treatments may also
impact the levels of imidacloprid in nectar, even if treatments are
applied several months in advance of the bloom.
Currently, imidacloprid treatments are not permitted during
bloom or when honeybees are actively foraging within the grove.
The data reported here are measurements of residues in nectar
sampled from trees treated at least six months before bloom. The
data clearly show that residues at or above the NOEL are a rare
event.
During our monitoring program, there were two sets of data in
which the NOEL was reached, both from trees that were treated
during late August, September or October. At Lindcove Table 2,
one of the ten samples had a reading close to the NOEL, while the
remaining nine samples, including a second sample from within
the same block that registered the high reading, were four-fold
lower. In Hemet Table 6, the data were means for up to 10 samples,
indicating that the residues were generally high within those
trees.
Importantly, we have shown that imidacloprid residues do not
accumulate from year to year, even when toxic imidacloprid
metabolites are factored into residue measurements. This result
means that successive years of applications do not appear to have
an additive effect on the total residues. Rather, it is the timing of
the most recent application that will govern what residues are
present in the nectar. It is very difficult to quantify the relationship
Table 5. Results of imidacloprid, 5-OH imidacloprid and imidacloprid olefin residue analysis of citrus nectar collected from Valencia orange
trees at Agricultural Operations, University of California Riverside (Riverside County) during April 2011. Trees were treated in October 2010.
Table 6. Residues of imidacloprid, 5-hydroxy imidacloprid and imidacloprid-olefin in nectar collected from grapefruit trees in Hemet during
April 2010 and April 2011 after two and three years of treatment, respectively. Each value represents the mean for 7-10 samples for each
treatment.
58 Citrograph Magazine | Winter 2014
between the proximity of treatment timing in relation to bloom
and the likelihood that NOEL levels of imidacloprid will occur in
the nectar. The soil type has a major influence on this, with lighter,
sandier soils permitting greater uptake and, therefore, increasing
the risk to the nectar.
Our data suggest that Fall treatments of imidacloprid, particularly
those on sandier soils (as in Hemet), present a greater risk of
the nectar having residues at NOEL levels during the subsequent
bloom. As the soil changes towards a more loamy texture, there is
less likelihood that the NOEL levels will be reached, but there may
be instances when this occurs.
To minimize the risk of residues reaching the NOEL, treatments
should be made after bloom and before the fall, preferably during
the summer months of June-August (see the data for Ventura and
Temecula). This is opportune treatment timing for controlling ACP
during fall flush periods. If applications of imidacloprid are made
between June and August, then growers will benefit from better
targeting of ACP populations during the fall flush (and during the
summer months, due to more favorable uptake conditions) and
will also lessen the risk of treatment impacts on honeybees during
the following spring.