Barath, I feel the moral of the story is that it really doesn't matter what type of seed you use as long as it's not whatever rootstock they use in Florida. There was a thread here a while back, I think warren was part of it, but several members actually visited Lavern and was able to see how they propogate their trees. It turns out, if I recall correctly, their mango trees are not clones but planted from seed and that explains the variability in the seedling trees.
Remember that Leo Manuel has huge, highly productive trees and most of his trees are various random seeds he planted. He currently has many Kensington Pride seedlings. I have been advocating Lavern Manilla Mango trees as rootstock only because they are readily available and easily distinguished from the Florida grafted trees which don't have the Lavern tag on them.
If I compared rate of trunk growth between my Kent seedlings vs Lavern Manilla seedling, my Kent seedling is actually growing faster than the Lavern Manilla seedling.
Some people have difficulty sprouting mango seeds or have an immediate need for rootstock and the Lavern Manilla is excellent rootstock that you can easily find and even with the variation of the seedlings, trees grown in California have adapted very well. Once I get more data, I will feel more comfortable recommending Kent, Tommy, Haden, Keitt, Manilla/Ataulfo/Champaigne seedlings as rootstock for California. Preliminary evidence show that Kent may work as well or perhaps even better than Lavern Manilla.
Simon