The Tropical Fruit Forum

Citrus => Cold Hardy Citrus => Topic started by: hardyvermont on March 19, 2019, 01:20:27 PM

Title: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: hardyvermont on March 19, 2019, 01:20:27 PM
When trying to speed up blooming on a seedling, does the rootstock make a difference? 
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: lebmung on March 19, 2019, 04:09:25 PM
There are various methods to induce blooming, many not publicly shared.
From my point of view the answer is yes to some extent and no as a general rule.
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: Ilya11 on March 19, 2019, 04:22:50 PM
Strong rootstock will assure a rapid growth, resulting eventually in a quicker maturation.
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: kumin on March 19, 2019, 05:11:17 PM
In Florida seedlings have been trained to grow upright supported by a pipe framework, lateral branches are pruned off. At 3.3 meters there is 90 degree horizontal turn and the apical leader is trained to follow it. Flowering has been induced in as little as 2 years using this method. Obviously Florida has a very favorable climate that might be difficult to replicate.
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: mikkel on March 19, 2019, 05:32:19 PM
Is there a report about this method somewhere to find?
I guess  it is not possible to have 3,3m growth within 2 years in northern german climate.
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: shiro on March 19, 2019, 06:07:33 PM
Strong rootstock will assure a rapid growth, resulting eventually in a quicker maturation.


So that's not certain Ilya.

Example:
A pear scion grafting on pear seedling takes longer than the same pear tree on quince tree.
To have fruit faster it is well known that it is necessary to use PG dwarfing is coming from cuttings.

Also you leave a seedling and you want to make fruit faster.
1) So I would use an adult tree to graft my scions ( because mature ) .
2) Or mature Poncirus cuttings.
If you use a vigorous PG from seedling I think you'll wait a long time and it's pretty normal because the Scion is not mature and the PG also is not old enough to give fruit.

So use to make fruit faster
Poncirus cuttings or other citrus
especially flying dragon cuttings.

However it will not be vigorous according to the choice of citrus.
The best is a vigorous citrus cutting ( no seedling ) if you want it to grow fast is giving fruit fast

However do not forget the cultivation method using the branch in ( arcure )

Bending a branch too vigorous, the movement of the SAP is slowed down, and it is forced to give fruit earlier and to take less strongly into sterile shoots. This operation is applicable to all fruit trees.

https://www.wikizero.com/fr/Arcure (https://www.wikizero.com/fr/Arcure)
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: kumin on March 19, 2019, 06:16:25 PM
My recollection is that Fredrick Gmitter at Lake Aldred FL USA was the scientist that used this technique in the effort to develop resistance to HLB. I will try to find the article, it may have been in the" Citrus Industry".
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: kumin on March 19, 2019, 06:48:09 PM
Here's a video touching on this subject:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNxREt0DgQ4. I found this intriguing, but it probably requires a greenhouse to perform it ideally. This topic starts at 1:00
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: lebmung on March 19, 2019, 07:18:40 PM
Is there a report about this method somewhere to find?
I guess  it is not possible to have 3,3m growth within 2 years in northern german climate.

This is a Japanese method. Not much information in English.  We discussed about this last year here.
One thing I found is the use of very old pt interstock which makes the tree dwarf and maybe induce flowering.
Of course there are also hormones who van be used.
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: hardyvermont on March 20, 2019, 12:43:51 AM
Here's a video touching on this subject:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNxREt0DgQ4. I found this intriguing, but it probably requires a greenhouse to perform it ideally. This topic starts at 1:00

Thanks Kumin, viewing the details makes it the method clearer.  Dr. Gmitter may have been the researcher who gave a talk at the Southeast Citrus meeting in November. 
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: Ilya11 on March 20, 2019, 04:51:10 AM
Strong rootstock will assure a rapid growth, resulting eventually in a quicker maturation.


So that's not certain Ilya.

Example:
A pear scion grafting on pear seedling takes longer than the same pear tree on quince tree.
To have fruit faster it is well known that it is necessary to use PG dwarfing is coming from cuttings.

Also you leave a seedling and you want to make fruit faster.
1) So I would use an adult tree to graft my scions ( because mature ) .
2) Or mature Poncirus cuttings.
If you use a vigorous PG from seedling I think you'll wait a long time and it's pretty normal because the Scion is not mature and the PG also is not old enough to give fruit.

So use to make fruit faster
Poncirus cuttings or other citrus
especially flying dragon cuttings.

However it will not be vigorous according to the choice of citrus.
The best is a vigorous citrus cutting ( no seedling ) if you want it to grow fast is giving fruit fast

However do not forget the cultivation method using the branch in ( arcure )

Bending a branch too vigorous, the movement of the SAP is slowed down, and it is forced to give fruit earlier and to take less strongly into sterile shoots. This operation is applicable to all fruit trees.

https://www.wikizero.com/fr/Arcure (https://www.wikizero.com/fr/Arcure)
Shiro,
First of all, it is not about pears, but citruses. Quite a different biology.

Second, we are discussing methods for breaking juvenility in seedlings, not of bringing rapid fruiting in plants grafted by already mature wood.
 
Maturity of poncirus rootstock has no influence on juvenility of grafted immature seedlings, although a large satsuma interstock can accelerate flowering.
In citruses, the moment when a wood is committed to flowering depends on the overall size of the plant ( some believe that it is a number of nodes from the ground that serves as a proxy).

After this state is reached the methods that interfere with gibberellin /auxin ratios like bending, girdling,  stressing by drought or the  use of chemical retardants  can be used  for flower induction.
 
Grafting of immature seedling on the strong rootstock permits a rapid growth to achieve the critical size of the plant. For the majority of citruses it is  2-3 m high. To achieve it more rapidly, one could initially suppress  the size branches but to keep them at maximal height. Japanese scientists (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423808000770) are using strong shiikuwasha seedling rootstock to achieve early flowering in around 2 year time.

From my own experience the grafting on a strong 5star citrumelo results in flowering after 3 years.
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: lebmung on March 20, 2019, 02:00:06 PM
Quote from: Ilya11
Maturity of poncirus rootstock has no influence on juvenility of grafted immature seedlings, although a large satsuma interstock can accelerate flowering.
[/quote
A mature pt interstock can induce flowering in the same way c. Depressa rootstock does. It also makes the tree dwarf, so the hight doesn't need to be 3m.
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: Ilya11 on March 20, 2019, 03:17:36 PM
The results are the same with satsuma seedling rootstock, just operationally it is more convenient to use strong classical satsumas grafted as interstock on poncirus.
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: mikkel on March 21, 2019, 04:59:19 AM
a picture of grafted immature hybrids on strong rootstocks in S.Korea.
(https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7808/32484138897_88f849e20c_z.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/RuvGLi)Copyright Malcom W. Smith (https://flic.kr/p/RuvGLi)
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: mikkel on March 22, 2019, 03:36:20 PM
Here's a video touching on this subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNxREt0DgQ4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNxREt0DgQ4). I found this intriguing, but it probably requires a greenhouse to perform it ideally. This topic starts at 1:00
I just noticed it.
Thanks
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: Ilya11 on April 26, 2019, 02:53:58 PM
A  recent article (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/pbi.13132) describes monoembryonic line of Hong Kong kumquat with extremely rapid maturity (a juvenile period of about eight months)
Title: Re: Precocious Poncirus, Flying Dragon, Standard Poncirus, or mature citrus?
Post by: mikkel on April 26, 2019, 04:19:15 PM
 a genetic population with 220 hybrids between F. hindsii and F. crassfolia has been successfully bred and cultivated on a just 10 m2 horticultural shelf. Based on this population, a fine genetic map for fruit-related traits has been under construction in our lab. In addition, a juvenile period of eight months of F. hindsii is the shortest among the early flowering germplasms in the citrus taxa to our knowledge (Tong et al., 2009), suggesting the prospects of generating BC1, F2 or even introgression lines based on F. hindsii. More importantly, all previous transgenic F. hindsii lines carrying different sequences blossomed and bore fruits in their first or second year (Cao et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017c; Zhang et al., 2009), suggesting that genetic modification does not disturb its intrinsic feature of short juvenility.

interesting. hindsii plants are easier accessable and crossings are easier reproducable than those with C.wakonai. But in case of of early flowering it might be still topped by C.wakonai. But in opposite to it hybrids still keep precocious flowering trait. As far as I know C.wakonai hybrids loose this trait in further generations.