Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Till

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9
26
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Yuzu as a rootstock
« on: January 27, 2024, 12:41:52 PM »
I have no experience with it as a rootstock. But it seems to me that it has very healthy roots, something a rootstock should have.

27
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 23, 2024, 05:07:27 PM »
Ilya, I am thinking about it. I may test a cutting.

The climate here is special. In my childhood -20°C was very common, even for two weeks. Now, the lowest temperatures are about -10°C. Winters are cool and wet but usually not very frosty. Yet the growing season is still short (begin of April to end or mid of September) and late frost remains a problem. -10°C in April is well possible. That is a real challenge for Poncirus or citranges that have started to grow then. Yuzu does better in late frost. But its overall hardiness is not sufficient.

Only 30km away is one of the mildest areas of Germany (around Cologne and Bonn). Poncirus grows very well there and citrumelos did well for at least many years. The lowlands...

28
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 23, 2024, 08:33:00 AM »
I fear I need a lot of patience. I live about 500m above sea level. So even Poncirus does not grow well if planted outside. So I have to plant as many plants as possible under glas. There Poncirus needs about 7 years from seed to flower. Kucle x Poncirus was a bit faster but only two seedlings have bloomed so far - and did not set fruit.
I am going to graft many seedlings onto older plants in hope that they need only 4 years then.

Some seedlings will be planted outside but only those that can reasonably be expected to be hardy down to -20°C / -4°F. I will not test those seedlings that are most likely only as hardy as citranges. I need not know whether they can withstand -10°C / 14°F or -15°C / 5°F. It is not enough at any rate. I shall use these seedlings for further crosses as fast as possible. What I will test are the further crosses.

What I will plant outside are those many seedlings that do not contain very special genes, those in which only the overall gene combination may be of value. So all zygotic seedlings of my citrumelo that were produced by selfing will be planted outside. Also combinations like Poncirus x citrange. When they are not hardy enough to survive then they have no value for me at all. Even if they taste well they will not be better than existing hybrids except they are hardier.

But I shall not test for instance Ichang Papeda x Amoa8 or Poncirus x Sucrena. The latter ones are definitely not hardy enough but have value for me because they may contain the genes for bloody fruits or sweetness. When they are not hardier than existing hybrids they are still more valuable for me because they contain special genes.

So that is the logic of my testing. I will, however, make cuttings form some potentially hardy plants and test the cuttings out of curiosity. I shall do that as I have time. So I will probably not consequently do that.

29
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 23, 2024, 01:35:08 AM »
I consequently wrote the mother plant first (as is convenient in biology).

I do not castrate the flowers because I pollinate too much flowers. I have not the time to castrate them. It is then a bit more difficult to recognize the hybrids. But I am quite optimistic that I can do it nonetheless. Trifoliate leaves are only one characteristic of Poncirus hybrids. There are many others (paired first leaves or not, form of leaves, taste, leaf texture, leaf size etc.). I think it will become quite clear in the second year which are hybrids. Many can be recognized already now when you have a close look at the plant. The same is true I think for most other non trifoliate hybrids.

Regarding the Yuzu x Poncirus hybrid it was clear from the beginning that it is not nucellar. And some trifoliate leaves were then I clear sign that it is a Poncirus hybrid. It is indeed startling that it is mostly monofoliate. I also had a Kucle x Poncirus cross that was almost totally monofoliate. My supposition is that Papada genes can supress trifoliate leaves. Another example would be N1triVoss (Ichang Papeda x Poncirus) on the origin of which, however, some have cast doubt. The other explanation (or lets better say guess) of monofoliate Poncirus hybrids is that they are triploid. Now, my Yuzu x Poncirus does not look like a triploid I would say.

Regarding taste: Well, the taste may in many cases be far from our dreams. Yet I am optimistic. Dunstan Citrumelo has a very good taste. The other Citrumelo I used is not a culinary revelation but has high potential for it is very aromatic and even a bit sweet. Batumi Citrumelo is also tasty, as is Sanford Curafora. The Poncirus types I used are also better tasting ones that are in some year so good that you can almost eat them out of hand. So I am optimistic that at least some hybrids will taste better than Morton. Yuzu x Poncirus has no Poncirus taste in its leaves. That makes me also optimistic. The sole goal of all Chandler hybrids and of the one Sucrena hybrid is to get hardy plants with low acidity. My goal here is not to get tasty hybrids. I just want to take one step into the direction of hardy and sweet hybrids. Vainigla Sanguigno x Poncirus was also an attempt to create a hardy plant with low acidity. In that case my goal cannot be reached as I now know. Low acidity in Vainiglia Sanguigno is recessively inherited (defect NOEMI gene). In the case of Chandler (Siamese Sweet in background) I can reasoably expect that 50% of the crosses have only about 50% of the acidity of the sourest parent. My knowledge about Sucrena is more limited but I have hope. Sucrena is sweet because it converts acids into suggars more early and faster than normal sweet fruits.

I had a Calamondin bush of over two meters with plenty of fruits. My pollination of it was exceptionally loosy. While I normally take care that I am earlier than the bees I only pollinated from time to time my Calamondin bush without caring how old the flowers were. Under this circumstances I got about five hybrids per year. So I think you with your careful method should have a pretty good rate of hybrids - at least with Poncirus. I only got one single off-type seedling from Calamondin that had no Poncirus in its background. This is telling since Chandler and Limequat often bloom at the same time. The one off-type seedling has darker green leaves and grows faster than Calamondin. Leaf form and size is very close to pure Calamondin.

I do not have Taiwanica. I often wanted to get it but was never very keen on it. I think I already have better tasting trifoliate hybrids with more hardiness potential. Don't you think?

30
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 22, 2024, 03:25:38 PM »
Vainiglia Sanguigno x Poncirus. It had root problems so has not grown very big. Its sibling (not on the picture) had to be saved by grafting.



Chandler x (African Shadock x Poncirus).



C. ichangensis x Chandler. Some are hybrids,others probably not.



Limequat Tavares x Yuzu. Two very similar hybrids (the bigger ones). There are also smaller nucellar seedings in the pot.



Perhaps the only zygotic seedling of Tavares Limequat that I did not intend. Grafted on Swingle 5 Star. Its own roots were very problematic. The trifoliate is Morton. I also had trifoliate hybrids but they died. (Beginner's mistakes.)



Changsha x Dunstan Citrumelo. Look at the trifoliate ones. The rest will be nucellar.



Poncirus x Amoa 8? I am not sure if there is a hybrid.



Kucle x Poncirus






Changsha x Poncirus (a Poncirus with many zygotic seeds).



Red Fingerlime x C. ichangensis. Do you see hybrids? I am not sure.




I have many more seedlings, mainly with Poncirus as mother plant. But the seedings are two small that I clearly see were the hybrids are. This is especially difficult because I made backcrosses of Poncirus F1 hybrids onto Poncirus.


I did not state here which Poncirus I have used in the various crosses. In the case of Kucle x Poncirus I used dried pollen from precocious Poncirus mixed with pollen of a Poncirus from my garden that has not yet fruited. I only know that it is pretty hardy and that its motherplant had fruits that my parents call quite good. When I did not state the Poncirus clone then it was a better tasting one.

31
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 22, 2024, 03:02:36 PM »
Some citrumelo seedlings. (Sacaton? Nursery confused names). From open pollination.



Poncirus x Batumi Citrumelo. There are hybrids among them but hard to recognize.






C. ichangensis x Amoa 8 (="Rubino" from Agrumi Lenzi). I would say one hybrid, the "big" one in the foreground.




Other pictures will follow...

32
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 22, 2024, 02:57:32 PM »
Ok, here some photos. Many plants on the photos are yellow. The reason is our cold temperatures.

First, seedlings of Dunstan Citrumelo. Pollen was from C. ichangensis but I am not sure if the hybrids are from selfing or from the pollen applied. I see at least four zygotic ones:



Here older seedlings of Dunstan Citrumelo (pollen of C. ichangensis). Two hybrids with C. ichangensis, one big and one small. The seedlings with regulary trifoliate leaves are probably nucellar (= Dunstan Citrumelo as we know it):





Yuzu x Poncirus. Almost totally monofoliate, sometimes trifoliate leaves:



Calamondin x Poncirus, the oldest hybrid. Leaves trifoliate and very variable.



Calamondin x precocious Poncirus, besides a nucellar seedling:




Other Calamondin x Poncirus crosses. (I had more but not all had healthy roots.)



Poncirus x Chandler. I see at least one hybrid (the bigger one), possibly two (close to the middle). The rest are just Poncirus seedlings (nucellar? zygotic?).



Poncirus x Sucrena (the left seedling).



Poncirus x Sanford Curafora (look at the narrow leaves). Perhaps the other one is also a hybrid.




Other pictures are following...

33
Citrus General Discussion / Re: Amoa 8 Blood Mandarin…woah!
« on: January 22, 2024, 01:50:41 PM »
...what would be an annoying problem for breeding.

I try to make crosses between Moro and C. ichangenesis and Amoa8 and C. ichangensis. I hope that helps. One hybrid so far but I don't know if it has the gene for coloration.

34
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 22, 2024, 12:55:21 PM »
Hi Lauta_hibrid,
I have one cross Yuzu x Poncirus. There might have been more but most seeds got rotten. And I have pollinated Tavares Limequat with Yuzu. I got two hybrids. All hybridization attempts of 2022 were in vain. I had tried to pollinate Yuzu with Poncirus again.

What concerns the different seed colors I have written about I must perhaps revoke my very optimistic conclusions. I had to store the seeds in water for two days before I could sow them. At the time when I sowed them the color differences were almost gone. It can be that my optimism was overhasty. I am going to post a picture of the seedlings so that all can see how many hybrids realy were among the seeds.

Yuzu seems to have variants. The number of zygotic seedlings is not always the same. There also seem to be greater taste differences. Most Europeans like Yuzu, those in the state usually dislike it according to this forum.

Pictures of hybrids follow soon. I have to bring the children to bed first  :)

35
Citrus General Discussion / Re: Amoa 8 Blood Mandarin…woah!
« on: January 21, 2024, 05:27:33 PM »
Concerning the genetics of the blood oranges, I have read the following:
1. All Sweet Oranges contain only one functional copy of the Ruby gene. It is though inactive in all of them except the blood oranges. The blood oranges possess a mutation that activates the Ruby gene under cold stress so that it produces the color of the fruits. Its original function seems to have been rather different, namely light protection in young shoots and leaves. 2. Poncirus possess two functional copies of the Ruby gene. Poncirus does, however, not produce red fruits because the Ruby gene is only active for light protection. 3. Mandarins do not posses a functional Ruby gene.

So all crosses of blood oranges with Poncirus contain at least one functional copy of the Ruby gene, the one from Poncirus. 1/4 of them should contain the mutation attached to the Ruby gene that causes red coloration of fruits. 1/4 posses the Ruby gene for light protection from Poncirus and a dysfunctional Ruby gene from the orange part.

So no F1 cross of Poncirus with Blood Oranges possesses more of the Ruby gene (with mutation) than Blood Oranges themselves. The difference is only that thoses F1 crosses having the Blood Orange gene also posses another functional copy of the Ruby gene in its original state, where Blood Oranges have a dysfunctional copy.

The big question is now why we do not have blood citranges. The answer can in my view be threefold: 1) By chance. When only 1/4 of all crosses have the genes for bloody fruits then we perhaps just had bad luck and got only the 3/4 without the desired genes. 2) The functional copy of the Ruby gene in its original state undermines the activity of the mutated Ruby gene. 3) Citranges just do not feel the cold stress that is needed for activation the Ruby gene from Blood Oranges.

So far my memories and conclusions. I am looking forward for your comments / critic, and sugestions.

36
Citrus General Discussion / Re: Amoa 8 Blood Mandarin…woah!
« on: January 20, 2024, 11:46:29 PM »
Yes, myself. I am not sure if there are hybrids among the seedlings from last year.
Amoa8 is largely nucellar. But I had seeds with pale color besides the normal green seeds in one year. Unfortunatelly, I lost all seeds in that year.
I still wonder why we have no colorated citranges although Ruby Red was often used in breeding. I fear that Poncirus blocks pigmentation. We will see what happens with Amoa 8 crosses.

37
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 20, 2024, 04:56:36 PM »
Hmm. Then it can also be that the green embryos are from Yuzu selfpollination? Sounds plausible.
By "both parents" you mean the parents of Dunstan or the parents of the seeds, i. a. Dunstan and Yuzu?

All seeds of Yuzu pollinated with Staraji were pale.

Ok, I shall wait for the seeds to germinate and keep you updated.

At any rate my Yuzu seems to produce a greater number of zygotic seedlings so probably also hybrids.

38
Citrus General Discussion / Re: Amoa 8 Blood Mandarin…woah!
« on: January 19, 2024, 08:29:33 PM »
I have it. It is really dark red every year and tastes sweet. A bit small the fruits and not the complex special aroma of Moro blood orange but definitely tasty. Blooms willingly.

But I do not believe in the hardiness claims. Such a hardiness is totally unlikely given the parents of Amoa 8. I would assume that it is not hardy at all, not more than any common citrus. I have seen that Italian nurseries often make totally exaggerated claims of hardiness. I do not know how they come to these data. They even state that pure Pumelo is hardy to -10°C (14°F) or sour orange hardy down to -15°C (5°F) which is foolish. I shall believe that they survive such temperatures for one hour without any wind when temperature is then again above freezing. But that is not the hardiness we use to speak about here. If Italian hardiness claims were true noebody would waste a thought about (really) hardy citrus.

39
Citrus General Discussion / Re: Leaf cuttings citrus propagation
« on: January 19, 2024, 08:18:43 PM »
Yes we have to be open for all possibilities that are backed by the observable facts. And it is good to be open for new phenomena.

I remember a very respected and experienced forum member of this forum and the old citrus forum who was absolutely sure that any Poncirus hybrid must have horrible taste and that any new hardy breed with Poncirus blood in it will not be worth tasting. Then Ilya began extensively posting and it became silent about this opinion. Indeed, the facts had changed and so why not changing one's mind?

40
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 19, 2024, 03:34:46 PM »
I should have time to make photos on Monday. The mother plants inherits so called plasma genes, genes not contained in the nucleus, and all cell organs. Do you know how that effects the hybrids? I have no guess how.


Maybe I shall add that Satsuma is also heterozygous for nucellar embryony. If not it could hardly be explained why Kijomi (Sweet orange x Satsuma) is zygotic.

Willow Leaf Mandarine is also heterozygous because its offspring Clementine is purely zygotic.

Grapefruits as Sweet Orange x Pumelo crosses should be heterozygous for nucellar embryony what would also explain why some citrumelos regularily produce some zygotic seeds.


My encouragement to use nucellar varieties as mother plant shall of cause not overstressed. There are varieties that are really difficult mother plants. Perhaps Morton citrange is such a candidate. And the pollen donor plays a greater role in the formation of zygotic seeds. So I do believe that certain crosses are close to impossible. I only wanted to say that nucellar embryony is not necessarily a great hindrance. And before you loose your time in search for zygotic mother plants as I first did it is probably better to just try what you have at hand even if nucellar.

41
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: Heterozygosity and zygotic breeding lines
« on: January 19, 2024, 02:29:13 PM »
I agree with Lauta_hibrid that purely zygotic varieties are the best starting point for anybody who wants a high percentage of zygotic seeds. The downside of such a choice is, however, that you have a very limited genetic pool for starting any breeding. It depends on the very special goals one has if that is a real downside.

As far as I know all oranges are mutations of a single ancient cross (Pumelo x Mandarine) x Mandarine. (I do not know what was father or mother.) On the one chromosome set oranges are pure mandarines, the second chromosome set consists of about 50% pumelo genes and about 50% mandarine genes. Oranges produce mostly nucellar seedlings. But there have been orange hybrids that are zygotic, namely: Sanford Citrange, Phelps Citrange, Clementine and Kijomi. There are also orange hybrids with a noteworthy percentage of zygotic seeds as C35. I conclude from that that all oranges are heterozygous for nucellar embryony. I would also assume that some citranges are only highly nucellar because of the Poncirus part of the cross.


Aside from these considerations, I would recommend to anybody who wants to make crossbreeding that he does not focus too much on the issue of nucellar embryony. I cannot boast to be a successfull breeder because most of my seedlings have not yet flowered. But I have produced a greater number of hybrids. So I can already tell from experience: Polyembryony and nucellar embryony are annoying but no real hindrance in many cases. If you believe that a certain plant has all the properties a good motherplant should have except zygotic seedlings then just try the cross. You may be surprised how many zygotic seeds you get! Or you may be disappointed. Then try it again with more flowers in more years. You will be likely to succeed. And when you succeed you will be faster as the one who waits the same time for getting a zygotic motherplant.

Today I harvested all my Yuzu fruits (very tasty by the way). Some had been pollinated by Dunstan Citrumelo. And surprise! About 1/4 of the seeds were green, the rest pale. That means that about 1/4 of all seeds must be hybrids and that an unknown number of the pale seeds must also be hybrids by the law of probability. (The green color comes from the citrus part of Dunstan Citrumelo, the pale color comes from Yuzu or the Poncirus part of Dunstan Citrumelo.) Ok, last year, I pollinated with Poncirus and had no hybrids at all, only nucellar seedlings. Does that matter? Only a year later my largely nucellar Yuzu gives my plenty of hybrids from a different but very interesting cross.
I got hybrids from 100% nucellar Calamondin, from 100% nucellar Tavares Limequat, from nucellar Vainiglia Sanguigno (very difficult though), from highly nucellar Dunstan Citrumelo, from Poncirus (nucellar seedlings unknown). Great, isn't it? But when I started my experiments I was so keen on getting zygotic mother plants. I was happy when I got Chandler. "Wow", I said to myself, "so many seeds in a fruit and all zygotic!" Yes, in theory. But I tell you something: Although my Chandler is full of flowers every year I got only one single fruit with seeds in it. All crosses were in vain except the one with "African Shadock x Poncirus". Poncirus pollen on Chandler - all in vain. Other pollen? All in vain. But Chandler pollen on allegedly nucellar Poncirus: one hybrid! I do not know what the problem with my Chandler is. Others were more successfull. But one thing I do know: There is a great difference between theory and practise. The good news is: Although the practise may laugh at your best theories, often it is more friendly to you than all earnest considerations.

42
Citrus General Discussion / Re: Leaf cuttings citrus propagation
« on: January 17, 2024, 07:00:42 AM »
Very interesting discussion here!
That the leaf was monofoliate and the shot trifoliate is no great surprise I would say. The leaf has nerves and leaf form typical for trifoliate hybrids. And that a trifoliate hybrid has mono- and trifoliate leaves is nothing special. When we assume that the leaf was originally trifoliate than its even more plausible what we see.

What is really surprising for me is that a single citrus leaf can develop into a complete plant. I don`t know whether I will ever make use of that but it is definitely cool.
The better way to propergate from limited material is supposedly to use leaves with a short piece of the twig (5mm or so) and with the bud. Then its more likely that you get a shoot in due time.

43
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: First fruits of Citrumelo 5star x Morton cross
« on: January 16, 2024, 04:58:50 AM »
And sorry. I was mistaken. I do NOT know how sweet the fruits on the photo are. I confused it with Chandler x PT (sibling of Swingle 5 Star??) an also almost unknown seedling from Bernhard.

44
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: from grafting to flowering
« on: January 15, 2024, 12:06:21 PM »
I have never observed that the height of a twig has something to do with production of flowers. To the contrary: Weakly growing lower twigs are the first to flower according to my experience.

45
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: from grafting to flowering
« on: January 15, 2024, 12:00:37 PM »
In my experience, grafts of Poncirus and Poncirus hybrids usually flower after three years when the tree is at least 1,5m high. That seems to have something to do with the natural position of flower buds on short side shorts: In the first year the graft produces a long unbranched twig. In the second year it gets short side branches on which flowers appear in the third year.

Poncirus seedlings flower at about 2m high (from bottom to the tip of the highest twig).

Two grafted Citrumelos the budwood of which was most probably from mature trees flowered at about 1,7m-2m height. So there seem to be a mimimum height below which flowering is not likely.

I have forgotten what my Yuzu tree did. But I think it was not very slower. I have at least a "tree" only 1 m hight that does flower.

Two Kucle x Poncirus crosses bloomed at about 1m.

Growing conditions may also play a role. Drought stress or root problems may induce earlier flowering. That could have played a role in my glashouse in hot summers. Maybe your Yuzu tree is just too happy to flower :-).

46
Well, there are some African relatives of Citrus with trifoliate or pinnate leaves which resemble citrus very much. It is also commonly stated in literature that the leaf morphology of Citrus is based on pinnate leaves. That can clearly be seen at the point where petiole and leaf are connected. A Citrus leaf is morphologically a reduced pinnate leaf. It also happens that crosses between Poncirus and citrus have pinnate leaves, at least transitorily. So there is indeed something in the background of all citrus plants that points into the direction of pinnate or trifoliate leaves. Nonetheless your crosses show that trifoliate leaves of Pummelo x Kaffir hybrids are at least not common.

But I am not an expert in genetics. Old genes can be deactivated by newer genes or can be completely lost. And I think we all agree that the family tree of Citrus that we know indicates that trifoliate leaves have long disappeared from most of its branches.

47
Thank you for the photos! I believed Pumelo x Kaffir would be trifoliate because of old otherwise recessive genes. That is not true then.

48
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: First fruits of Citrumelo 5star x Morton cross
« on: January 15, 2024, 03:48:01 AM »
Right. Does not look very attractive. But Bernhard said it was sweet. So it has probably inherited the acidless allel from Siamese Sweet, its grandparent. Aside from that the picture is not very telling because we don't know the growing condition. A different citrumelo will not necessarily perform better in North Germany.

I have again some zygotic seedlings of Dunstan Citrumelo. At least four of one small fruit. Two seem to be monofoliate. Two have paired first leaves while all the rest has alternate leaves. My other citrumelo (origin unclear) does also produce a number of zygotic seeds. So citrumelos are good mother plants. My Dunstan was again pollinated by C. ichangensis. But flowers were not castrated. So its not clear yet what seedlings I have.

49
Hello Lauta-hibrid,

thank you for your openness to give and share! And thank you for sharing information with us. You have a long list of interesting crosses. I am most curious to know how your Limequat hybrids develop. You are welcome to share any new observation about them.
I wanted to make crosses with makrut myself. But now I see that the leaf taste is largely not dominantly inherited. That is a very important information for me, though not the one I hoped for. I think you saved me a lot of time in that you did the experiment I wanted to do. I shall by oportunity only still check what happens when Markut and Ichang Papeda are crossed.

50
Cold Hardy Citrus / Re: First fruits of Citrumelo 5star x Morton cross
« on: January 13, 2024, 11:26:12 AM »
It is in fact not clear what "Swingle 5 Star", the plant Ila has made famous, actually is. It was for years believed to be a zygotic seedling of Swingle Citrumelo. But Bernhard Voss who distributed it has recently corrected himself and said that the real Swingle 5 Star, the one he called so, the one that is a seedling of Swingle Citrumelo, is another variety. There has be a mislabeling when Bernhard sent plants to Ilya.

We decided in the forums to still call "Swingle 5 Star" what has always been called Swingle 5 Star in the public because the variety Bernhard Voss originally called so is only known by a handfull people besides Bernhard himself. It would be too confusing to abolish the established name "Swingle 5 Star" because of a plant that hardly any person exept its breeder knows to exist. So lets continue calling "Swingle 5 Star" what Ilya has made famous.

That, however, means that the tale about its origin is not founded. What we can definitely say at the moment is that "Swingle 5 Star" from Ilya is a kind of Citrumelo, i. e. a cross of Poncirus with a pumelo (C. maxima) or with a grapefruit (C. paradisi). That is obvious. But more is spekulative.

I know that Ilya has searched for the real origin of his "Swingle 5 Star" and was in contact with Bernhard. Perhaps he has fresher information than I have. My information is from Ilya from last year.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk