Concerning the genetics of the blood oranges, I have read the following:
1. All Sweet Oranges contain only one functional copy of the Ruby gene. It is though inactive in all of them except the blood oranges. The blood oranges possess a mutation that activates the Ruby gene under cold stress so that it produces the color of the fruits. Its original function seems to have been rather different, namely light protection in young shoots and leaves. 2. Poncirus possess two functional copies of the Ruby gene. Poncirus does, however, not produce red fruits because the Ruby gene is only active for light protection. 3. Mandarins do not posses a functional Ruby gene.
So all crosses of blood oranges with Poncirus contain at least one functional copy of the Ruby gene, the one from Poncirus. 1/4 of them should contain the mutation attached to the Ruby gene that causes red coloration of fruits. 1/4 posses the Ruby gene for light protection from Poncirus and a dysfunctional Ruby gene from the orange part.
So no F1 cross of Poncirus with Blood Oranges possesses more of the Ruby gene (with mutation) than Blood Oranges themselves. The difference is only that thoses F1 crosses having the Blood Orange gene also posses another functional copy of the Ruby gene in its original state, where Blood Oranges have a dysfunctional copy.
The big question is now why we do not have blood citranges. The answer can in my view be threefold: 1) By chance. When only 1/4 of all crosses have the genes for bloody fruits then we perhaps just had bad luck and got only the 3/4 without the desired genes. 2) The functional copy of the Ruby gene in its original state undermines the activity of the mutated Ruby gene. 3) Citranges just do not feel the cold stress that is needed for activation the Ruby gene from Blood Oranges.
So far my memories and conclusions. I am looking forward for your comments / critic, and sugestions.