Two studies published in Nature last year cited evidence that overuse of neonicotinoid pesticides was harming bee populations. One of the studies found that bees were drawn to neonicotinoids, which are derived from nicotine, possibly similarly to how humans are attracted to nicotine. This means that bees may prefer a food source that harms their nervous system. from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jan/12/bayer-revises-position-extra-protections-for-bees-from-pesticides
Can't find the article talking about long range remanence of this product but this article explain that toxicity for bees remain for at least 1 year. https://pro.anses.fr/euroreference/Documents/ER11-METHODES-ResidusEN.pdf
So as I was answering to Luc, efficient product but not very Earth friendly...
Excuse me if Wikipedia said its true then it has to be true.
I don't see anywhere in that passage that says it is toxic to bees for multiple years after an application? I do see where it
says it takes 30-60 days to move through the tree. And where does it say it is more attractive
to bees then regular untreated flowers from citrus??? The forum members who are using this product
are applying it to trees that are in decline not trees that are flowering anyway?
Now humans are attracted to nicotine? Where did you read this?
When I go into a store my kids always head to the tobacco aisle, no they actually head to the legos.
Do legos have nicotine in them?
You continue to distort and embellish the facts, ok you are biased against this pesticide but why do you keep
distorting the facts. You also say you can't remember where you read it but the effects can last up to a year.
Up to a year is not Many years as you originally claimed or 30-60 days as the passage claims. You might as
well claim it last for decades. When the oranges are in full bloom How are bees more attracted to an odorless drug?
Don't believe everything you read