Has anyone created a passive solar style greenhouse, requiring little to no extra energy input?
Something using a similar concept to this:
https://www.mainepublic.org/environment-and-outdoors/2023-01-25/this-maine-home-can-stay-70-degrees-without-a-furnace-even-when-its-freezing-outside
These passive solar designs always seem to ignore the common winter condition of "freezing, windy, cloudy, wet for days in a row" where there is no meaningful solar heating and any accumulated thermal mass is gone by the second night.
These passive solar house designs also always seem to ignore aesthetics with most being ugly as hell, the best only being bland, but all being incongruous to neighborhoods and landscapes (like a black, badly-proportioned house being plopped in the Maine countryside). I am also not enamored with their potential for irreparable or hard-to-repair age-related failures; frankly, I do not believe these houses will age well. Like most things constructed today, they are made seemingly to fail and be replaced. Such a throwaway mindset negates the positive environmental impact of their low energy consumption by building in a requirement to replace items that have high embodied energy.
Here is an example I cited when I worked in historic preservation. Vinyl replacement windows are very popular, touted as a way to save both the environment and money. The Obama administration attached all sorts of tax credits to their installation for that reason. Yet, they are a scourge, particularly to historic buildings, damaging to a building's historic fabric, the environment, and the building owner's pocketbook. I will not bore everyone with all the details, but one Kentucky study showed that it took between 30 and 45 years to recoup the initial expenditure of industry standard replacement window installation, while the windows themselves maintained their optimal energy savings for only 10 years, after which time their energy usage, air leakage, and insulating quality were no different in performance than historic wood windows in average condition. The difference between those replacement windows and the historic ones they replace, is that historic windows in suboptimal condition can be reglazed and repaired, often onsite and with only a modicum of skill and energy expenditure. Their replacements themselves have to be either completely replaced or sent back to the factory for repair once they are no longer functioning properly.
So, as you may be able to tell, I am not going to be demolishing my house and replacing it with the latest and greatest and greenest and trendiest. I will be sticking with things more tried and true because, as Neil Young sang, "Old ways comin' through again."