Where you sit is what you see. The evidence for the danger of Imidacloprid is so compelling that Europe has outlawed it. There have been many studies on its damage to bees' nervous system.
Your anecdotal observations can't trump all this science. Just because you don't see dead bees or a noticeable decline in bees doesn't mean no harm has occurred. It took a long time to see DDT damage, too.
It's not compelling to anyone doing their homework.
Bee colony decline has been relegated to various issues, main ones being virus and/or varroa mite attack. There are many other factors that are at play.
I will continue to use the product in spite of the knee jerk European histeria based on some religion promulgated by the green movement. It is safe, effective and this aint no anecdotal evidence. Recommend you take it up with the USDA who has extensively tested it and approved its use for consumables and research the scientific field studies, a few I'll post here.
Here's one Italian study linking a product containing imidacloprid with bee kills. Was found to be a false positive. This is just one example suggesting imidacloprid haters are full of bee jelly.
In 2001, no hive losses were recorded in the region of
Friuli although the percentage of drilled Gaucho® FS
350 dressed corn seeds was significantly increased over
2000. This observation in combination with the results
of the presented replicated cage study make it very unlikely
that the bee colony losses in 2000 were linked to
the drilling of Gaucho® FS 350 dressed corn seeds. Accordingly,
the real causative factors (e.g. climatic conditions,
bee diseases) of the bee hive losses in 2000 remain
to be elucidated in order to develop appropriate
preventive measure against losses in future. http://www.ask-force.org/web/Bees/Schnier-Bee-Safety-Bulletin-2003.pdf...and another refuting your claims -
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10646-012-0863-x Many laboratory studies described lethal and sublethal effects of neonicotinoids on the foraging behavior, and learning and memory abilities of bees, while no effects were observed in field studies at field-realistic dosages. The proposed risk assessment scheme for systemic compounds was shown to be applicable to assess the risk for side-effects of neonicotinoids as it considers the effect on different life stages and different levels of biological organization (organism versus colony). Future research studies should be conducted with field-realistic concentrations, relevant exposure and evaluation durations. Let's just give a lab mouse a lethal dose of LSD and see what gives.
...and another....
4. CONCLUSIONS
The results presented in this review show, that the main contamination danger for bee products originates more from apicultural practices
than from the environment.
The main contamination risks for the different bee products are:
• Honey: antibiotics
• Wax: persistent lipophylic acaricides
• Propolis: persistent lipophylic acaricides,
lead
• Pollen: pesticides
• Royal jelly: antibiotics.
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/89/21/66/PDF/hal-00892166.pdfPerhaps the Euro ag community needs to reflect on their own farming practices before using Bayer Environmental as an excuse for their failures.
Having said that, even though bees constitute a small part of total pollinators population, I err on the cautionary side and drench after a bloom cycle.
I doubt if you're a commercial grower trying to make a living providing food for the masses.
Mark