Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - agroventuresperu

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Silvopasture
« on: April 10, 2024, 01:47:29 PM »
Can anyone here point me to some successful examples of silvopasture with cows and high-density tree plantings? Most examples I see are very widely spaced plantings or dense plantings but within widely spaced rows. I'm interested in seeing something more similar to what we have here which is trees everywhere planted very close.

2
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Drought in the Amazon
« on: April 09, 2024, 08:20:58 PM »
Everything will be alright doesn't jive with me either. The climate change is normal and fluctuations are natural camp doesn't have many survivors these days. And the god will look after us camp was abandoned long ago. CO2 levels need to fall and emissions get increasing and vegetation clearing continues unabated.

Don't worry the Peruvian government will fix it.

3
I have a chocolate business so I grow cacao. But I also grow pataxte, cupuasu, and other theobromas and herranias. I like them all. But chocolate is a good business and I eat some chocolate as well. The rest of them are nice to have but it’s not a business. If you have plenty of money and don’t need to make a profit with your farm. …
Peter

No. There is no money to be made here from Cacao. The climate is slightly wrong, but more importantly, the economics involved with trying to amend the soil for commercially grown cacao where there are already significant levels of subsoil aluminum saturation on very steep slopes where machinery or vehicles cannot access does not make sense economically. People grow coffee here, which is a little more forgiving of that, but eventually their management causes too high levels of Al saturation for that as well, and so they burn all the shrubs and plant Brachiaria, or just let it grow fallow and go grab another patch of forest to destroy.

I would argue it's not so important species selection for profitability. Site selection is more important. But if it's all about the economics, then the environment typically gets thrown under the bus. Most people in this world don't have the money to be amending soils or buying agricultural land with fertile soil. It's a lot easier and more profitable to go make fertile soil by turning rainforest into ash.

From my experience in this area of the country, I'm not sure what I would recommend other than coffee in terms of profitable export crops. For a national crop, I might tentatively recommend Caimito as it seems to be a fruit that a lot of Peruvians in this region really like, and there are a lot of trees that fruit successfully around here without any help.


4
So you have found the traditional method of cleaning Pataxte seeds with sand works best?
Thanks for the feedback.

I find peeling it with my fingers and teeth works best while I'm already working on eating the pulp.

5
Thanks for letting me know. I always wondered what was below that layer.

6
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Drought in the Amazon
« on: April 08, 2024, 09:28:26 PM »
La Nina will soon be here. Hotter seas means more water in the atmosphere and it all about where it falls. ENSO is the main one to look at but the southern annula mode, Indian Dipole and a few others are worth looking at due to global implications.

La Nina coming-maybe.  The latest NOAA statement gives it a 62% of developing by June-August.     

With this past seasons' El Nino, the odds of a more active hurricane season for Hawaii were heightened.  In fact, tropical storm activity turned out to be quiet.

Weather disasters are on the increase in the US and elsewhere, so I take exception to the notion that "everything will be alright".   Indeed, that's not true for the past, present or future!

La niña has already arrived in Peru. El niño is officially over. 5C colder than normal ocean temps along the north coast right now. The prediction for the period April-June for our area is slighly higher than normal precipitation for the quarter. I hope they're right.

7
florida natural farming[/url] (fnf) doesn't water any of his trees, are his mango roots deeper than the roots of mangoes that are regularly watered?   

fnf is on a mission to plant bananas next to all his mangoes.  the bananas trade, via fungi, their surplus potassium for the mangoes' surplus resources.  potassium provides greater tolerance to cold stress among other things.  an interesting tidbit from the fig article is that figs have more potassium per ounce than bananas.   
Fnf either doesn't know what he's talking about or has deceived himself.
 
It's also common for the soil at the spodic layer and even below to remain saturated, and anearobic, through much of the rainy season. Tap roots of almost all fruiting trees cannot survive in anaerobic conditions. Anybody who tells you that mango or almost any other fruit trees have deep tap roots in spodosols is not living in reality.

This fellow goes into a backhoe cut then shows and explains very well how it works. He also explains how seemingly good looking  trees perish in Florida dry season when the shallow rooted trees haven't enough to keep them going.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlZwb4dGbGM

As for bananas trading potassium, I'd enjoy seeing some research documenting that. But I do know that banana accumulates potassium, even in the pseudostems. Since banana stems are disposable annually at harvest, that biomass production contains the potassium and can be used as chop/drop around the fruiting trees. Ive done that continuously but eventually trees crowd out bananas in most cases. A quicker source of cheap potassium is wood ash of any type, even washings from biochar production is good.

Any idea what's below the Spodic layer?

8
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Drought in the Amazon
« on: April 07, 2024, 09:21:01 PM »
We are much drier than normal as well. Here it seems to me as if the dry season is kind of typical but we don’t get a proper rainy season. So, it makes it hard to plant but our production has been great. We just finished a very good cacao harvest I’m getting lots of black pepper, our Mamey, canistel, and sapodilla have been pumping. Just waiting for the durian and mangosteen flowering now.
When I say dry I mean that we are getting about 80” of yearly rain with distribution through the year. It’s dry for us but grass is still green where you don’t water. It’s the same in Panama, the canal is having big problems. We used to get an average of 150” sometimes going up to 220” per year.
It’s also hotter with less rain.
Peter

That sounds a lot like here. Today was another good example, the sky got black to the north, and some big gusts picked up and knocked over some banana plants, I could see rain in the mountains on the way, and it looked like we were about to get blasted by a big thunderstorm or something, but then we didn't even get a millimeter of drizzles. Then later today it happened again, the clouds started building up to the east, and the sky got very dark, all around. Then over the course of the next half hour, I watched as all the clouds basically disintegrated, and we received no precipitation. Sunset was a cloudless sky. I've observed that sort of thing a lot over the course of the past 1.5 years. Looks like deliberate weather modification.

Last night we somehow managed to squeeze out 9mm of rain before midnight, which really surprised me, because yesterday's sunset was also cloudless. We have been getting enough rain, barely. Doesn't feel like we've had any excess this year. It seems like it has been constantly flirting with drought this past year.

9
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Drought in the Amazon
« on: April 07, 2024, 09:13:51 PM »
I am quite curious to see how the hurricane season stacks up in the Atlantic
with such warm water conditions this year, apparently will be a doozy.

2024 Atlantic Hurricane Season Could Be One Of Most Active On Record, CSU Outlook Says
https://weather.com/storms/hurricane/news/2024-04-04-hurricane-season-outlook-april

The various online news reporting entities are predicting a more active Atlantic hurricane
season for 2024, with:

named storms       23
hurricanes             11
major hurricanes     5

It is of course unknown at present how many could make landfall in the US or in other
areas. Fingers X-ed that the fewest of these possible storms affect us rather than many.

Paul M.
==
I've read that El niño is typically associated with less rain in the Amazon basin. Maybe the active hurricane season can somehow produce more rain for us at the extreme western end of the basin during what would typically be our dry season?

10
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Drought in the Amazon
« on: April 06, 2024, 10:12:18 PM »
Just wondering if any of this made it onto the radar of the media in the USA?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JFx_xGhugU

It looks like things are shaping up to be even worse this year. March is typically the rainiest month of the year here, and it turned out to be a huge disappointment. Way below normal. Haven't been too impressed so far with April either. My wife's from a village where the river (the Huallaga) overflows typically in March and April. It hasn't even come close this year. We need to start getting a lot of rain for that to happen, but the problem is May & June is typically the start of the dry season.

I've seen a huge difference here just since we moved here. Something's off about it. The way we used to get rain all day or all night. Now we might get the same sort of clouds, but we're lucky if they drop more than a millimeter. I've heard a lot of people comment this year about how there's hardly any coffee, and It's been a long time since we had a big rain event. I installed a rain gauge last year in July, which is the middle of the dry season. The biggest rain event between then and now was back in October:  3.52 inches.

The way it fails to rain often is a little unnerving. This area will be in big trouble if things don't change.

11
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Florida Natural Farming?
« on: April 04, 2024, 11:46:48 AM »
No question that mycorrhizae and symbiotic root fungi is vitally important for nutrient uptake and there a many species and specialist associations. My scepticism was regarding the ability of systems and specific plants to unlock meaningful volumes of plant nutrients in existing minerals and even rock flour it its added. You need to be careful with fodder plants which are frequently serious weeds. Buffel, Brachiara and leucaena are bad news in many areas. Mowing once a year? I have to strain the mower through 12 inch wet shagpile like dense grass every fortnight.

When I first got into horticulture I heard things like, "growing plants! How hard can that be? Just put them in dirt and give em water."

I think it's possible what you're asking about. I've seen large trees in many places growing out of rocks, so it's not like there's some large volume of soil that they are tapping into.

I don't think anyone has all the answers. In my opinion a lot of regenerative/biological farming types like to predate on the wishful thinking of people in that space with anecdotal, untested, unproven products and approaches. Their audience cuts them too much slack. It's refreshing to read posts like pineislander's above post. It's not a religion. Growing plants is like anything, on the surface it seems simple, but when you take a deep dive into the rabbit hole and go ever further into the nitty gritty, it's more complicated than brain surgery.

Oh yeah. Once a year. I think we even did 1.5 years in some areas. Some places have 12 foot tall grass. We use high-powered Maruyama weedwackers with brush blades. I'd like to find some sort of brush hog, but it's not practical in this context.

12
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Florida Natural Farming?
« on: March 28, 2024, 10:24:09 PM »
Epiphyte, thank you for the info on germination and the offer of seeds, maybe I'll take you up on it one day.

Satya, watched your video.  Thank you for sharing, I've been off the forum for awhile, but will be updating posts on my projects soon.  My favorite posts on the forum are when people share how and what they are growing and especially when I get to see photos of all the different growing spaces and plants.  So want to contribute to the forum in that way as well.

I consider wood chip or chop and drop mulch and living mulch both important in how I grow. 

Mulch is beneficial for a number of reasons that we are all familiar with like protecting the soil and holding in moisture. 

Living plants used as a living mulch may even be more beneficial if you have the right plants for your growing conditions.  Not only does it provide ground cover and protection holding moisture, it's the root exudates on growing plants that feed the soil microorganisms in the rhizosphere buffering pH and turning minerals into a usable form by plant roots.  Plants capture carbon and contribute to the hydrologic cycle.  It seems counterintuitive but I've found that plants in groups hold moisture longer and grow better together.  There are exceptions of course, finding the right plants that don't dominate. 

The science of soil microbiology is evolving rapidly.  What seemed like settled science just a few years ago are being challenged.  There's a lot of fascinating stuff happening beneath our feet.  Many are aware now how important mycorrhizal fungi are.  There are also studies finding that roots exude light underground, why are they sending out light waves in the darkness of the earth?   The more people that start growing in a way that protects and supports our soil, the closer we get to growing to our potential.

Janet

This is a great question. Which offers the better net benefit? The living plants that use nutrients and may even have allelopathic effects like a lot of pasture grasses? Or the traditional orchard management of mow & mulch?

In our pasture I think the grass might even offer a better net benefit despite its allelopathic effect. The roots are pretty deep and are able to mine nutrients from aluminum toxic subsoil that many of the tree species' roots are not even able to grow in. They help add soil organic matter to the profile via root exudates.

The grass is not that bad in my opinion. We have been able to let ours go for over 12 months at a time between mowings. I actually think it's worse to have other plants, because then you end up with more challenging plants like kudzu and calopogonium or even spiny plants. We have some areas where the grass never established well, and those areas are more of a pain, with woody weeds growing.

13
Sorry Cacao fans this one isn't for you. Cacao seeds are horrible. That's why most people ferment them and add sugar. The labor requirement is immense to actually properly process the seeds. The pulp is very minimal and, I will admit, has a decent flavor, a little sour but OK. However, the amount of pulp is too minimal to be worthwhile. Plus Cacao has next to no tolerance of aluminum saturation, so it's just not a good choice for many tropical soils. Pure cacao doesn't even have a nice stimulating effect. I much prefer coffee or coca leaf if I want something that's a stimulant. Also Cacao is high in oxalates.

We planted Theobroma bicolor. One of them fruited at two years, most fruited at three years. They seem pretty forgiving of poor soil. The pulp is delicious (a creamier flavor vs. the tart flavor of the cacao) and there is a decent amount unlike Cacao. The best part: the seeds. They are like gigantic, fat pumpkin seeds that taste exquisite when toasted.

14
Most of the fruit trees we grow want sun so in those cases you would keep the Inga back.  Keeping in mind that to successfully shape fruit trees it’s important that the sun hits the sides of those trees as well as the top. 
So, we might be planting small fruit trees of less than a meter high with a spacing of perhaps 8-10m between them.  If your main problem is aggressive grass it would be ideal to shade this area between the fruit trees and maybe even tackle the grass with geo textile.  If the grass is manageable it would be nice to grow other stuff like bananas, pineapples, passion fruit, and many other intercrops to use the space between the small trees up until they are able to dominate it.
To get back to your question, the thing is that we are talking about Inga because it produces a dense shade.  Cacao can grow, up to a point, in this shade.  Some garcinias, but I really prefer a lighter shade for these shade tolerant fruit trees.  I suspect that you would need a combination of shade trees that Inga could be a part of.  We use Brownea, glircidium, and erithrina, which are also nitrogen fixers but the shade is less intense than Inga.  Every option has its advantages and I think that the Inga is not something to completely cover any fruit tree but to be there in a managed context.
Peter

Do you get those parasitic plants growing on your Ingas? I never considered ours to be deep shade, but when they get a lot of the parasitic plant then they produce shade like a Mango or Pomarrosa.

15
It wouldn't work real well here at my location in Hawaii.  The horrible Guinea grass would spread, vines would climb to smother the fruit orchard and eventually giant albizia weed trees would take root, some day shading out everything.  Of course it would take several years to actually kill off the fruit trees.  The big ones such as artocarpus and durian would probably survive.   

That said, I just let the grass grow over the Spring/Summer then cut it back in the fall.

Guinea grass?. Do you mean Panicum maximum?? Or Pennisetum purpureum? I've heard the former is actually quite shade-tolerant. Is that true?

16
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Rice Husk Ash (RHA)
« on: March 28, 2024, 09:33:08 PM »
Have you look into converting it to biochar? I’m sure there is specs on the them temp needed to do it with rice husk. You can then “activate” it (make it a nutrient resevoir) by running bokashi leachate through it. Bokashi is basically fermented organic waste. The easiest way to make it is using lactobacillus (kombucha bacteria) to convert the sugars from fruit waste into a moderately acidic potassium rich solid waste which is easily composted. The liquid runoff is super acidic and the possum ions will bind to the carbon rich char and the acidity will neutralize any alkaline ash.

There is some potential/theoretical risk with producing poly aromatic hydrocarbons but these are also made by some natural wood decomposition.

I think there's a municipality that actually does that. I'm not too interested at this point though.

17
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Florida Natural Farming?
« on: March 22, 2024, 10:29:44 PM »
I am a bit sceptical about soil biota and additives being able to release nutrients locked up in mineral form.

There's so much nuance there. So much we don't know. Phosphorus is a great example. So many different forms. Here's an excerpt from Pedro Sanchez's book, Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics.

Here he explains the steps of a Hedley Fractionation to distinguish among the different types of Phosphorus in a soil sample:
 
Quote
• Soil solution Pi: resin Pi, capturing phosphate anions in the soil solution.
• Labile Pi: available Pi, or Olsen soil test available phosphorus (bicarb Pi). When another soil test is more effective in a region, such as Mehlich or Bray, it can be used instead. This is why I call this fraction labile and not bicarb.
 • Active Po: labile Po. Clearly, this is because it contributes directly to plant available phosphorus by rapid mineralization.
• Sorbed Pi: The NaOH-extractable Pi fraction, phosphorus sorbed on the surfaces of iron and aluminum oxides (Garcia-Montiel et al. 2000).
• Slow Po: NaOH-extractable Po.
• Primary weatherable phosphorus minerals: sonic Pi.
 • Passive Po: sonic Po + residual Po: extracted with hot, concentrated HCl (Tiessen and Moir 1993) if measured.
• Calcium-bonded Pi (Ca-Pi): dilute HCl-extractable Pi. May reflect the phosphorus fertilizer that has not reacted, as well as any apatite present.
• Residual phosphorus: H2SO4-extractable Pi: Mostly occluded and reductant soluble Pi 

 And some comments about biologicial influence on the availability of some of these fractions:

Quote
Mycorrhizal associations with roots are extremely
important for most tropical plants and increase the effective
root area from 2 to over 800 times. Mycorrhizal plants take
up not only the soil solution Pi and labile Pi and Po pools but
are also able to access sorbed (NaOH) Pi.

Plant roots continually exude complex mixtures of carbon
compounds into the rhizosphere. This includes organic
acids such as citric, malic, acetic, lactic, oxalic, piscidic
acids, and others. These acids dissolve solid fractions of
inorganic and organic phosphorus, bringing it into the labile
and soil solution phosphorus.

Some acids can be quite specific. Ae et al. (1990) found
that piscidic acid exudates by pigeon pea dissolved some of
the iron-bound phosphorus in a red Alfisol but did not react
with calcium-bonded phosphorus in an adjacent black Vertisol in Patancheru, India. In a phosphorus-deficient (2 mg/
kg Olsen P) Oxisol of western Kenya, George et al. (2002)
found that the phosphorus-accumulating shrub Tithonia
diversifolia slightly acidified the rhizosphere, lowering the
pH from 4.8 to 4.5, causing a significant decrease in the soil
solution Pi, sorbed Pi and the slow Po fractions up to about
6 mm distance, suggesting that part of these fractions were
taken up by the plant. In contrast, the legume Tephrosia
vogelii increased the rhizosphere pH from 4.8 to 5.4, which
decreased the slow Po fraction. While such research cannot
establish quantitative effects, or whether it is the effect of
organic acid exudation or of a proton balance, George et al.’s
data imply that these two very different agroforestry species
may be able to tap sorbed Pi and the slow organic Po fraction.
It is interesting that the labile Pi and active Po fractions were
not affected.
Roots can secrete acid phosphatase ectoenzymes, which
they do faster and in larger quantities when phosphorus
deficiency occurs, breaking down some organic phosphorus
pools. Rao et al. (1999) also suggested that species tolerant to
low available phosphorus levels, such as Stylosanthes guianensis and Brachiaria decumbens secrete phytase, the enzyme that
breaks down inositol hexaphosphate (the main constituent
of organic phosphorus) in these phosphorus-deficient soils.
The rhizosphere processes are an evolving science, with few
hard data at the field level.







18
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Florida Natural Farming?
« on: March 22, 2024, 09:50:09 PM »

I thought Costa Rica was a lot more progressive than Peru. Don't they pay farmers there to preserve forest? Things are pretty out of hand here. As much money as the government takes from the citizens, you'd think they'd actually do their jobs. If someone is clearcutting (and burning) a tract of land zoned as forest, you'd think it would be as simple as calling the police and the people being arrested within the hour. Instead, the Peruvian government opts for a much more bureaucratic process that inadvertently gives the offenders up to another month and a half to keep destroying more forest before the gov't forestry agency is obligated to visit the site.



It only is progressive in tourist areas and in media. the amount of money they pay for reforestation is enough to pay your yearly property taxes, not more than that. Laws here are very poorly imposed. after someone stole our electric meter, police itself tells us to put up a high fence, a camera, get a couple of guard dogs and some loud geese 😩. Their investigation ends at taking a report and photos of the "crime scene". Even violent criminals (caught during an organized robbery, for example) let go after 48 hours in many cases. and everyone burns plastic garbage though it's illegal, and does controlled fires of fields, though it's illegal, too. organic certification here is a joke, you basically just need to keep a journal and tick mark things you do, and tell the inspector "yes" or "no" for him/her to tick mark a form. The local organic association guy lives 15 meters from Delmonte fields and sells his produce in the farmers market as organic, and teaches others how to farm organically.
Many nasty chemicals that are prohibited in Europe and even in the US find their way here; common people think that Glyphosate is organic and that "soil doesn't have enough nutrients so we have to put in fertilizers" (direct quote, I'm not kidding....) no one ever using protection while spraying; lots of education is needed to prevent locals from ending up like in Madagascar, because Delmonte and Chiquita (the biggest ag players here) are doing their quick and dirty job of destroying the biodiversity and soil, and the local culture makes it too easy to use chemicals to make everything look "clean" and "neat", just burn all the grasses with glyphosate "only once", and you will have no problem with pasto - that's what our neighbor keeps telling us every time he passes by... he did it, and now he has a perfectly manicured soccer field that no one ever plays in.
I wonder how it is on Peter's side, because here in Perez it's very hard.

Wow! Sounds like business as usual in latin america. Just out of curiosity, do you know what soil classifications are common in your area?

19
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Florida Natural Farming?
« on: March 22, 2024, 09:45:30 PM »
Agroventuresperu,

There are several good lectures by Dr. Christine Jones and Dr. Elaine Ingham online if you search their names and soil health. 

I agree John Kempf's Regenerative Agriculture Podcast is my favorite.  Some of my favorites from his podcasts and webinars:

Redox: The driver of soil microbial interactions with Olivier Husson
How healthy plants create healthy soil
How to diagnose hidden hunger and mineral imbalances
Plant Health Pyramid
Managing Nutrition at Critical Points of Influence

The more I read and learn, the more I realize that what I think is best isn't necessarily right for everyone and I try not to make too many judgements about what other people are doing.  I experiment a lot and do what works best for me but what's best is continuously evolving.  What I think is most helpful is for as many of us to share our experiences so that we may learn from each other.

I think in general most people are doing the best they can under their circumstances and with the information they have.  My livelihood doesn't depend on crops not being destroyed by pests or diseases, so it's an easy choice for me to not use pesticides. 

Janet

Thanks for the recommendations. Elaine Ingham is a name I've heard recommended many many times. On the Regenerative Agriculture podcast they interviewed someone very similar to her, Kris Nichols.

20
I think that when the trees are young it is important to do good quality maintenance. Grass will compete with superficial roots. You want to have the root feeding area covered with mulch and keep the grass and aggressive weeds out.
However an older grove is different. Under my large mangosteen trees practically no maintenance is necessary. We need to keep the surrounding forest back somewhat but that is not monthly weed whacking.
So the shade is what is making the difference. If open areas between young fruit trees were planted with inga, for instance, that would cut down on surface maintenance as well and provide more mulching material.
Peter

Which young fruit trees are and are not tolerant of Inga shade in your experience?

21
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Rice Husk Ash (RHA)
« on: March 22, 2024, 09:24:29 PM »
Any studies on accumulation of toxic metals? I went through the same process looking up birch ash. I think for rice leaf cadmium etc may be of concern for bioaccumulation.

If you know where it's grown you can soil test for Cd and other metals. Will a given species bioaccumulate a given metal? There are probably studies with the most common crop species. There's even some literature that says Brazil Nuts bioaccumulate Selenium. No idea how they found that out or tested/proved it. What would be the source of the Cd?

One thing I've always wondered, but haven't ever taken the time to do a deep dive is with soil Aluminum saturation, which is extremely common in the tropics. I know some species have different strategies to cope with the presence of Al3+, some exclude it completely from the roots, but I've also read that other species can accumulate it and isolate it in certain tissues. Not sure what that means for fruits and other foods grown in such soils - if it translates to humans ingesting significant levels of Aluminum? I would think if it were really a big issue, than it would be something well-known, and people in tropical areas would be plagued with the related health problems, but I've never heard of such a thing.

22
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Rice Husk Ash (RHA)
« on: March 22, 2024, 11:28:06 AM »
Here's a decent article from Brazil:
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3052/305257981008/html/




So, 1.1% Potassium? Am I reading that right? That's very underwhelming.

I really tripped and stumbled throughout the whole article. It looks like it even got published in a journal despite no apparent proofreading of the English.

Here's their concluding remark:
"As corrective of soil acidity, the residual effect of RHA comes down to the time needed to occurs the natural process of reacidification and leaching of basic cations, about 33 months for soils and weather conditions similar to this work."

And my proposed revision:
Regarding the amelioration of soil acidity, the residual effect of RHA is determined by the time required for the natural processes of reacidification (pH) and the leaching of basic cations (Base Saturation) to arrive at levels equal to those measured prior to the application of RHA. We infer that this residual effect is about 33 months in soil and weather conditions similar to those of this study.

23
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Rice Husk Ash (RHA)
« on: March 20, 2024, 10:07:29 PM »
What do you know about this as a fertilizer/soil amendment? We have a huge rice industry here as well as a brick industry. The brickyards mostly all use rice husks for fuel. Some places give away the resultant ash.

Some concerns I have are that the rice production is subjected to lots of chemicals: pesticides, fungicides. I would assume all of this would be volatilized when burned, but maybe not? I also can't really find any proper analysis that would mention the percentage of N P K Ca Mg S and its CaCO3 equivalence. Softwood ash has about a 30% lime equivalence, but a short-term residual liming effect, so it doesn't seem like it would be very effective to decrease subsoil Aluminum saturation. I can't imagine that rice husk ash would have a significantly longer term effect than wood ash.

Here's one source:
The rice husk ash (RHA) was produced from rice husks pellets (6 mm in diameter) burned in a boiler with a rotary grate, specially designed for producing biofuels. The burning temperature inside the combustion chamber was kept below the melting temperature of the ash and reached 980 to 1030 °C. The combustion temperature at the outlet of the chamber ranged from 750 to 920 °C. The time of complete combustion of the rice husks was in the range of 4 to 6 min. The pH of the used RHA was 10.7 and the material contained 0.27% of N, 4.02% of C, 1.45% of P, 0.6% of Mg, 3.88% of K, 0.51% of Ca, 0.05% of S and 0.08% of Na.

No idea the temperatures used here and all those other parameters, but those nutrients percentages are very low.  By comparison, the Umass.edu table
shows wood ash (guessing its hardwood)
Wood ashes - N0 P2 K6 Ca20 Mg1

Maybe if I can talk to the airforce to do a flyover and get them to drop a few tanker loads worth of the stuff, I think it could be promising.

24
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Dr. Thomas Dykstra
« on: March 18, 2024, 09:33:23 PM »
Regarding the brix levels of rainforest plants, one thing I noticed at the peak of our last dry season was that the cicadas became deafening in the afternoons, and many trees were infected with moths. I also think it's pretty common that a lot of the broad-leaved understorey plants to be subjected to herbivory by grasshoppers, but it's usually not a complete defoliation, just a few bites here and there.

25
Tropical Fruit Discussion / Re: Dr. Thomas Dykstra
« on: March 18, 2024, 09:30:06 PM »
It would also be interesting to see what typical leaf brix readings are for plants in tropical rain forests since he asserts these are all healthy. Anyone out there in the tropics have a refractometer handy?

Yeah, I'd like to get one. One of my coconuts got bad palm aphids recently. Never been a problem on any of our coconuts before. The one with the problem is the one that should be doing the best, because it's had so many high-quality inputs this past year...

In the webinar he mentioned that it's just an indicator, and unfortunately it won't tell you that you have a cobalt deficiency for example.

IIRC, His other webinar about the florida citrus industry does show some examples of orchards that have eliminated citrus greening by changing their management practices.

The company that published that webinar is all about sap analysis to manage plant health. It's the same company as the one that publishes the Regenerative Agriculture podcast. I recommend the podcast. I don't endorse any of their products, but they do publish high-quality content for free with some very knowledgeable guests. Their content has definitely influenced how I approach my own management.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk